AI-Powered Story Diagnostics

Agents don't tell you
why they said no.

StoryGecko does.

Every rejection letter says the same thing. "Not right for my list." "Doesn't align with what I'm looking for." Nothing useful. Nothing actionable. Just silence where feedback should be.

StoryGecko runs a chapter through 9 diagnostic agents — checking tension, escalation, stakes, causality, dialogue, pacing, voice, and theme — and tells writers exactly what a professional reader would flag before the manuscript ever reaches an agent's desk.

StoryGecko

The rejection letter that tells you nothing

From: Literary AgentRe: Your Submission

"Thank you for submitting your manuscript. Unfortunately, this project isn't quite right for my list at this time. I wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere."

No reason given. Was it the premise? The pacing? The dialogue? The stakes? You'll never know.
No direction forward. Writers revise in the dark, fix the wrong things, and resubmit to the same result.
No craft feedback. The first chapter signals everything to an agent — and most writers don't know which signals they're sending.
No second chance. Most agents won't look at a revised manuscript. The first submission is the only submission.

The first chapter tells an agent everything

Within the first chapter, an experienced agent is reading for dozens of structural signals. Most writers know these rules exist. Almost none can hold all of them in their head while writing.

01
Tension & Escalation
Does pressure build? Does each scene leave the protagonist worse off than when it started?
02
Stakes & Consequences
What does the protagonist stand to lose? Are the consequences real and personal?
03
Cause & Effect Logic
Do character choices drive outcomes, or do things just happen?
04
Scene Purpose
Does every scene change the situation? Or does the story pause while things are described?
05
Internal Conflict
Is there friction between what the character wants and what they fear?
06
Dialogue & Subtext
Do characters talk past each other with competing wants, or just exchange information?
07
Voice & Theme
Does the narrative voice feel specific and alive? Is the thematic argument operating in action?
08
Genre Conventions
Is the chapter meeting the specific structural promises of its genre?
09
Reader Momentum
Is there a question pulling the reader forward, or does the chapter close without pressure?

Nine agents. One comprehensive diagnostic.

StoryGecko runs nine specialized diagnostic agents in parallel — each focused on a different craft dimension — then synthesizes their findings into a single, actionable report.

01

Author submits a chapter

The writer pastes or uploads their chapter, selects their genre, and optionally notes any intentional choices they want StoryGecko to skip.

02

Nine agents run in parallel

Each agent is specialized: one reads for stakes, one for scene purpose, one for cause and effect, one for dialogue, one for theme. All nine run simultaneously in 15–30 seconds.

03

A synthesis agent compiles the report

A tenth agent reviews all nine findings and produces a structured diagnostic report: Critical issues, High Impact risks, Moderate observations, and Polish items — with specific, actionable guidance for each.

04

Iterative scanning closes the loop

After revising, the writer scans again — with previously addressed issues excluded — to surface the next layer of craft concerns. Each pass reveals something new.

What a StoryGecko report looks like

Every report is specific to the chapter — not generic advice, but grounded observations tied to actual moments in the text. This is a real diagnostic run on Chapter 1 of The Hunger Games.

StoryGecko Chapter Diagnostic
Chapter 1 of 27 · Early Setup · Young Adult · 9 diagnostics run
0
Critical
2
High Impact
3
Moderate
3
Polish
What's Working Well
Premise Detonation With Earned Force
You establish Katniss's love for Prim through action (the cheese, the protective gestures) before using it as the chapter's emotional bomb, which makes the final line land with genuine devastation rather than manipulation.
World Texture Before World Explanation
You give us coal dust, illegal hunting, and the tessera system through lived detail rather than exposition dumps, so readers experience District 12's oppression in their bodies before they understand it intellectually.
Identity Constraint As Survival Tool
Katniss's learned ability to hold her tongue and mask her thoughts isn't just characterization — it's the skill that keeps her alive, which makes emotional suppression feel like genre-appropriate stakes rather than withholding.
High-Impact Risks — Address in this draft
Energy Plateau
Woods interlude releases reaping pressure
The issue:
You open with "This is the day of the reaping" to establish governing dread, but the hunting/trading sequence feels like comfortable routine rather than mounting terror, which might make readers uncertain whether they should be relaxing or tightening.
One thing to try:
Consider letting Katniss's reaping fear infiltrate the woods moments — maybe she misjudges a shot because her hands are shaking, or she catches herself calculating Prim's odds while skinning a squirrel.
Internal Conflict Not Visible
Emotional suppression might read as emotional absence
The issue:
You show Katniss performing control ("I force myself to stay calm") rather than rendering what it costs her to maintain that mask, which might make readers see the strategy but not feel the internal war.
One thing to try:
Think about giving us a physical tell when she's suppressing something unbearable — a sensation in her chest, a taste in her mouth, something that leaks through even when her face stays blank.
Real diagnostic report — Chapter 1 of The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins

Built for every major fiction genre

Each genre has its own structural contract with the reader. StoryGecko's diagnostic agents understand the specific promises each genre makes — and flags when those promises aren't being kept.

Romance
Dark Fantasy
Epic Fantasy
Horror
Thriller & Suspense
Mystery
Middle Grade
Young Adult
YA Fantasy
Literary Fiction
Science Fiction
Historical Fiction
Romantasy

Your writers are getting rejected.
StoryGecko helps them understand why.

If your platform serves fiction writers, StoryGecko is a retention and engagement feature — not just a writing tool. Writers who understand why their work isn't landing stay on your platform longer, revise more actively, and submit with more confidence.

White Label Integration

Embed StoryGecko diagnostics directly into your platform under your own brand. Your users never leave your product.

API Access

Clean API endpoints for submitting chapters and receiving structured diagnostic reports. Integrates with any existing writing workflow.

Genre-Specific Intelligence

Thirteen genre frameworks — each with its own structural standards, craft issue taxonomy, and position-aware calibration.

Iterative Scanning

Writers can exclude previously addressed issues and scan again — surfacing new layers of craft concern with each revision pass.

Position-Aware Calibration

The diagnostic understands where a chapter sits in the manuscript — early setup, midpoint, climax — and calibrates expectations accordingly.

Proven on Published Work

Tested against chapters from bestselling novels across every supported genre. Finds real craft observations without overcalling or crying wolf.

Built for platforms that serve serious writers

Writing Software

Manuscript tools, story development platforms, and writing apps looking to add AI-powered craft feedback to their feature set.

Publishing Platforms

Self-publishing platforms and indie publishing tools that want to help writers submit stronger manuscripts.

Writing Communities

Online writing communities, critique platforms, and author membership sites that want to offer diagnostic tools to their members.

Literary Agencies

Agencies that want to help querying authors understand why their submissions aren't landing before they land in the slush pile.

Let's talk about what StoryGecko can do for your platform.

We're currently exploring partnership opportunities with writing platforms, publishing tools, and literary communities. If your users are writers, we'd like to talk.

partnerships@storygecko.com

We respond to every inquiry personally.