StoryGecko does.
Every rejection letter says the same thing. "Not right for my list." "Doesn't align with what I'm looking for." Nothing useful. Nothing actionable. Just silence where feedback should be.
StoryGecko runs a chapter through 9 diagnostic agents — checking tension, escalation, stakes, causality, dialogue, pacing, voice, and theme — and tells writers exactly what a professional reader would flag before the manuscript ever reaches an agent's desk.

"Thank you for submitting your manuscript. Unfortunately, this project isn't quite right for my list at this time. I wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere."
Within the first chapter, an experienced agent is reading for dozens of structural signals. Most writers know these rules exist. Almost none can hold all of them in their head while writing.
StoryGecko runs nine specialized diagnostic agents in parallel — each focused on a different craft dimension — then synthesizes their findings into a single, actionable report.
The writer pastes or uploads their chapter, selects their genre, and optionally notes any intentional choices they want StoryGecko to skip.
Each agent is specialized: one reads for stakes, one for scene purpose, one for cause and effect, one for dialogue, one for theme. All nine run simultaneously in 15–30 seconds.
A tenth agent reviews all nine findings and produces a structured diagnostic report: Critical issues, High Impact risks, Moderate observations, and Polish items — with specific, actionable guidance for each.
After revising, the writer scans again — with previously addressed issues excluded — to surface the next layer of craft concerns. Each pass reveals something new.
Every report is specific to the chapter — not generic advice, but grounded observations tied to actual moments in the text. This is a real diagnostic run on Chapter 1 of The Hunger Games.
Each genre has its own structural contract with the reader. StoryGecko's diagnostic agents understand the specific promises each genre makes — and flags when those promises aren't being kept.
If your platform serves fiction writers, StoryGecko is a retention and engagement feature — not just a writing tool. Writers who understand why their work isn't landing stay on your platform longer, revise more actively, and submit with more confidence.
Embed StoryGecko diagnostics directly into your platform under your own brand. Your users never leave your product.
Clean API endpoints for submitting chapters and receiving structured diagnostic reports. Integrates with any existing writing workflow.
Thirteen genre frameworks — each with its own structural standards, craft issue taxonomy, and position-aware calibration.
Writers can exclude previously addressed issues and scan again — surfacing new layers of craft concern with each revision pass.
The diagnostic understands where a chapter sits in the manuscript — early setup, midpoint, climax — and calibrates expectations accordingly.
Tested against chapters from bestselling novels across every supported genre. Finds real craft observations without overcalling or crying wolf.
Manuscript tools, story development platforms, and writing apps looking to add AI-powered craft feedback to their feature set.
Self-publishing platforms and indie publishing tools that want to help writers submit stronger manuscripts.
Online writing communities, critique platforms, and author membership sites that want to offer diagnostic tools to their members.
Agencies that want to help querying authors understand why their submissions aren't landing before they land in the slush pile.
We're currently exploring partnership opportunities with writing platforms, publishing tools, and literary communities. If your users are writers, we'd like to talk.
partnerships@storygecko.com→We respond to every inquiry personally.